Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance. Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. Share Flipboard Email.
Issues The U. Government U. Legal System U. Foreign Policy U. Liberal Politics U. Martin Kelly. History Expert. Martin Kelly, M. Featured Video. Cite this Article Format. In theory, as Cass and his supporters reasoned, in a democratic society free citizens determined the future. But in practice, questions remained concerning how to determine who qualified as a resident of a territory, how to regulate voting fraud, and what would happen to slaveowners and their slaves in territories where slavery was voted down.
Still, by allowing the people to decide, Cass hoped to ease the building tensions between the Northern and Southern wings of the Democratic Party. Nonetheless, sectional debate and instability continued unabated.
In order to avoid further threats of disunion, Senator Henry Clay devised the Compromise of as a final panacea.
A key component of the compromise was the implementation of popular sovereignty in the newly created Utah and New Mexico Territories. In this case, citizens in each territory were expected to vote on the slavery issue in the near future, and a climate unfavorable to plantation slavery made their votes non-controversial. Although popular sovereignty—alongside the banning of the slave trade in Washington, D.
The border between Kansas and Missouri became a hotbed of violence and intimidation. In , Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas, of Illinois, hoped to once again employ the principles of popular sovereignty in order to address the slavery debate, this time in the Kansas and Nebraska territories. Responding to the basic tenets of popular sovereignty, groups and organizations in both the North and the South encouraged and aided families and individuals to migrate to Kansas and sway the final vote.
The border between Kansas and Missouri became a hotbed of violence and intimidation, resulting in voter fraud and several antithetical constitutions proposed in Kansas. Sovereignty shall be vested in the people. Popular sovereignty as the legitimate source of authority in government has become so widely recognized among the democracies of our world that even non-democracies try to claim it in order to justify their exercise of power. In reality, the Communist Party of China has appropriated power for itself, which it exercises dictatorially to suppress any organized opposition to its authority.
Although economic freedom has increased dramatically in China in recent years, the party still tightly controls political life. Home Popular Sovereignty. There are four ways that popular sovereignty is expressed in a democracy. First, the people are involved either directly or through their representatives in the making of a constitution.
0コメント